Revitalizing Social Solidarity: Addressing the Community Crisis in Meritocratic Societies
Abstract
This article examines the crisis of social solidarity in meritocratic societies, which is driven by increasing social inequality and individualism. While meritocracy ideally ensures equal opportunities for all individuals, in practice, it often deepens social disparities and weakens communal bonds. This study aims to explore how the revitalization of social solidarity can serve as a solution to the fragmentation caused by meritocratic systems. Using a theoretical approach based on communitarianism, this article analyzes various strategies to strengthen social ties, such as community engagement, social capital development, and inclusive policy reforms. The findings indicate that social solidarity can be restored through active participation in community activities, increased involvement in broader social networks, and the implementation of policies that balance individual achievements with collective interests. Thus, revitalizing social solidarity is not only essential in addressing the negative impacts of meritocracy but also in fostering a more just and inclusive society.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Araki, Satoshi. “Beyond ‘Imagined Meritocracy’: Distinguishing the Relative Power of Education and Skills in Intergenerational Inequality.” Sociology 57, no. 4 (2023): 975–992.
Batruch, Anatolia, Jolanda Jetten, Herman Van de Werfhorst, Ce´line Darnon, and Fabrizio Butera. “Belief in School Meritocracy and the Legitimization of Social and Income Inequality.” Social Psychological and Personality 14, no. 5 (2023): 621–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221111017.
Cao, Hao. “Organizing an ‘Organizationless’ Protest Campaign in the WeChatsphere.” Big Data and Society 9, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221078823.
Cao, Lin, John Smith, and Richard Thompson. Social Capital and Inequality: Perspectives from Global Case Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
Darnon, Céline, Annique Smeding, and Sandrine Redersdorff. “Belief in School Meritocracy as an Ideological Barrier to the Promotion of Equality.” European Journal of Social Psychology 48, no. 4 (2018): 523–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2347.
Glinska-Newes, Aldona, and Joanna Górka. “Capabilities of Corporate Volunteering in Strengthening Social Capital.” Sustainability 12 (2020): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187482.
Glover, Malcolm Elliott. “Leading across Cultural Borders: A Communitarian Approach to Global Development.” International Journal of Public Leadership 12, no. 2 (2016): 154–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-11-2015-0028.
Heuer, Jan-ocko, Thomas Lux, Steffen Mau, and Katharina Zimmermann. “Legitimizing Inequality.” Comparative Sociology 19 (2020): 542–84. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-bja10017.
Hung, Andrew Tsz Wan. “A Case for Communitarian Meritocracy: A Critical Engagement with Michael Sandel.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 9 (2023): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-023-00375-z.
Ismanto, Sjafari, and Listyaningsih. “Money and Family Matter: Political Recruitment in the Golongan Karya Party of Banten Province.” In Iapa Proceedings Conference, 357–69, 2019. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2019.245.
Khalili, Barge Gul, Rahima Qargha, and Tamanna Quraishi. “The Influence of Social Media Networks on Families Dynamics: Opportunities and Challenges.” APLIKATIF Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities 3, no. 1 (2024): 1–11.
Koopmans, Ruud, and Michael Zürn. “Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism – How Globalization Is Reshaping Politics in the Twenty-First Century.” In The Struggle Over Borders. Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism, edited by Wilde, Pieter de Koopmans, Ruud Merkel, Wolfgang Strijbis, Oliver Zürn, and Michael, 1–34. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652698.001%0AThis.
Lee, Hanjin. “The Role of Civic Education to Overcome the Limitations of Meritocracy.” Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction 23, no. 9 (2023): 607–22. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2023.23.9.607.
Lien, Mai Thi Hong, Ngo Khac Son, Nguyen Thi Linh Giang, and Nguyen Hung Vuong. “Michael Sandel’s Conception of Community.” Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies 33, no. 4 (2022): 40–47. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJESS/2022/v33i4715.
Madung, Otto Gusti. “Krisis Demokrasi Dan Tirani Meritokrasi Menurut Michael Sandel.” Jurnal Ledalero 19, no. 2 (2020): 127–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.31385/jl.v19i2.212.127-144.
Mijs, Jonathan J. B. “The Unfulfillable Promise of Meritocracy: Three Lessons and Their Implications for Justice in Education.” Social Justice Research 29 (2016): 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0228-0.
Roex, Karlijn LA, Tim Huijts, and Inge Sieben. “Attitudes towards Income Inequality: ‘Winners’ versus ‘Losers’ of the Perceived Meritocracy.” Acta Sociologica 62, no. 1 (2018): 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699317748340.
Sandel, Michael J. “Populism, Liberalism, and Democracy.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 44, no. 4 (2018): 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453718757888.
Santa, Mijalche, Anita Ciunova Shuleska, and Nikolina Palamidovska Sterjadovska. “Understanding Social Capital in Community-Driven Ride Sharing: Lessons from a Developing Country.” The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 91, no. 1 (2025): e12347. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12347.
Tan, Petrus, and Oktovianus Kosat. “Meritocracy, the Reproduction of Inequality, and the Academic Scandal in Indonesia: Philosophical Perspective of Michael Sandel.” Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review 7, no. 1 (2024): 154–68. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i1.66253%0AMeritocracy,.
Vannier, Clémence, Hilda Mulligan, Amanda Wilkinson, Susie Elder, Ambika Malik, Daniel Morrish, Malcolm Campbell, Simon Kingham, and Michael Epton. “Strengthening Community Connection and Personal Well‐Being through Volunteering in New Zealand.” Health and Social Care in the Community 29, no. 6 (2021): 1971–1979. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13340.
Wilkinson, Richard, and Michael Marmot, eds. Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts. 2nd Edition. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 2003.
World Bank. “Gini Index - Sweden,” 2020.
———. “Poverty and Equity Brief: Brazil,” 2019.
Zahavi, Dan. “Individuality and Community: The Limits of Social Constructivism.” Ethos 50, no. 4 (2022): 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12364.
Zainal, Muhammad Rafsanjani, Khairol Anuar Kamri, Aizathul Hani Abd Hamid, Asep Dadan Wildan, and Charanjit Kaur. “The Relationship Between Humanity Values and Religious Tolerance for Strengthening The Social Cohesion of Urban Communities in Malaysia: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Techno-Social 14, no. 1 (2022): 56–65. https://doi.org/10.30880/jts.2022.14.01.008.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31385/jl.v25i1.653.19-31
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright© 2015 JURNAL LEDALERO This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero Jalan Trans Maumere-Ende - Sikka - Flores - Nusa Tenggara Timur - Indonesia Telp/Fax: 0382 2426535