Liberalisme versus Perfeksionisme? Sebuah Tinjauan Filsafat Politik tentang Relasi Antara Agama dan Negara
Abstract
this regard the state often fails, and indeed itself becomes part of the violation
of the citizen’s right to religious freedom. One root of the problem is a confused
understanding among law enforcers and among a part of the citizenship concerning
the relationship between religion and the state, between private and public
morality. This essay attempts to formulate a concept of the relationship between
religion and the state from the perspective of two models from political philosophy,
namely liberalism and perfectionism.
Perfectionism offers a solution to the pathology of liberalism which tends to privatise
the concept of the good life. In perfectionism the thematisation of the concept of the
good life as in ideologies and religions has to be given a place in the public sphere.
In Indonesia this role is taken by the national ideology of Pancasila. Pancasila
requires that religious values be translated into public morality.
Kata-kata Kunci: liberalisme, perfeksionisme, konsep hidup baik (agama),
negara, Pancasila.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Right, Oxford: University Press,
Finnis, John. Fundamentals of Ethics, Oxford: University Press, 1983
Horn, Christoph. “Liberalismus und Perfektionismus – ein unversőhnlicher
Gegensatz?”, in: Rolf Geiger/Jean-Christophe Merle/Nico Scarano
(Hrsg.), Modelle Politischer Philosophie, Paderborn: Mentis Verlag,
Kűng, Hans. “Leitlinien zum Weiterdenken”, dalam: Hans-Martin
Schoenherr-Mann, Miteinder Leben Lernen, Műnchen: Piper Verlag,
Latif, Yudi. Negara Paripurna. Historisitas, Rasionalitas dan Aktualitas
Pancasila, Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia, 2011
Madung, Otto Gusti. “Hubungan antara Iman dan Akal Budi dalam
Masyarakat Postsekular Menurut Jűrgen Habermas”, dalam:
Millah. Jurnal Studi Agama, Vol. X, No. 2, Februari 2011
Madung, Otto Gusti. Filsafat Politik. Negara dalam Bentangan Diskursus
Filosofis, Maumere: Penerbit Ledalero, 2013
Rawls, John. Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp,
Rawls, John. Politischer Liberalismus, Terj. W. Hinsch, Frankfurt am Main:
Suhrkamp Verlag, 1998,
Raz, Joseph. The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: University Press, 1986
Reder, Michael. “Religion als kulturelle Praxis an der Grenze zwischen
Glauben und Wissen”, dalam Knut Wenzel/Thomas M. Schmidt
(Ed.), Moderne Religion? Theologische und religionsphilosophische
Reaktionan auf Juergen Habermas, Freiburg im Breisgau: Verlag
Herder GmbH, 2009
Ringkasan Eksekutif Laporan Akhir Tahun Kebebasan Beragama dan
Intoleransi 2012 The Wahid Institute (ms.), Jakarta, 2013
Sena Utama, Wilden. “Negara (dan) Islam. Sekitar Polemik Soekarno
dan Natsir”, dalam: Prisma. Majalah Pemikiran Sosial Ekonomi, Edisi
Khusus/Vol. 32, No. 2 dan No. 3, 2013
Suhelmi, Ahmad. Polemik Negara Islam: Soekarno vs Natsir, Jakarta: UI
Press, 2012
Wall, Steven. Liberalism, Perfectionism, and Restraint, Cambridge:
University Press, 1998,
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31385/jl.v12i2.86.173-190
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright© 2015 JURNAL LEDALERO This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero Jalan Trans Maumere-Ende - Sikka - Flores - Nusa Tenggara Timur - Indonesia Telp/Fax: 0382 2426535